Share Action with Individuals/Foundations

It would be great to be able to share, like a soft-credit, an action from one constituent to another. Otherwise you have to create duplicate actions. Examples would be share spouse-to-spouse or foundation-to-individual etc

  • Guest
  • Sep 11 2012
  • Reviewed: Voting Open
  • Attach files
  • christine Anonymous commented
    August 31, 2021 16:45

    that would be fabulous

  • Teddi Taylor commented
    August 31, 2021 16:27

    In the same way that we can view spouse addresses with a checkbox, could we also not view everything else from the spouse record with a checkbox?

  • Deb Dressely commented
    August 31, 2021 16:07

    Yes please. Similar to soft credits on gifts.

  • Devan Caton commented
    August 31, 2021 16:06

    Yes! This would be so helpful! Right now, if one meeting or email occurs, it ends up getting added as an action multiple times (once on each individual and/or organization that was involved), inflating our count of actions, and making reporting difficult.

  • Karen Diener commented
    August 31, 2021 15:50

    This would be amazing, and it is something I have been wanting for (seriously) about 10 years now. It would save SO much energy for people - THIS is an enhancement that will have an immediate impact.

    Please be thoughtful about how to manage duplicate actions though. I know of many organizations that have duplicated actions on record because the "sharing" functionality did not exist. TEST IT LIKE CRAZY and get users VERY involved so that there isn't a poor rollout.

  • Jane Freitas commented
    August 31, 2021 15:48

    Great suggestion!

  • Guest commented
    May 22, 2018 09:11

    Yes please! This would save so much time!

  • Guest commented
    April 06, 2017 19:41

    Yes, this would be most helpful! I end up have to spend a lot of  time putting the same action in three different donors records.

  • Guest commented
    March 08, 2017 21:07

    This functionality definitely exists in Blackbaud CRM via entering "Participants" on an Interaction. It's intuitive, convenient, and useful. If it makes sense for the BB large, enterprise customers to have it, it certainly makes sense for us RE'ers.

  • Guest commented
    March 08, 2017 20:17

    Thank you Jarod,

    You did attempt to answer and my frustrations got the better of me. It is nice to know we are being heard. It can sometimes feel like we are yelling into the wind. Thank you for listening and sharing concerns with the solutions team.

    Deb

    Deb Dressely | Prospect Research & Database Manager
    Fairview Health Services
    Fairview Foundation & Ebenezer Society Foundation
    Riverside Professional Bldg. Suite 119
    2450 Riverside Ave
    Minneapolis, MN 55454
    Ddresse2@fairview.org | www.fairview.org
    Office: 612-672-7236 | Fax: 612-672-7799

    Connect with Fairview Health Services on social media.

  • Jarod Bonino commented
    March 08, 2017 20:04

    Thanks Deb. I do understand. I know the idea of multiple votes per user does appeal to some users. Internally, it was hard to tell how many people were leveraging it to really differentiate requests (vs just casting 3 votes every time). In any event, our new Idea Bank platform does not support the concept of multiple votes. I did attempt to answer Julie's question to the best of my current ability in my reply: "...this is something that we have tentatively discussed doing for Actions in RE NXT, although no formal commitments to doing it (or when) exist yet in RE7 or RE NXT." So unfortunately I don't have anything specific to provide in terms of a timeline for when or how we might be adding this feature, however given the recent comments and activity, I wanted everyone to know that we are aware of the feedback and discussing options. I at least wanted everyone here to know they were not being ignored by Blackbaud. :)

  • Guest commented
    March 08, 2017 18:56

    Hey Jarod,

    How about the multiple votes was a measure of the weight of the problem and should hold some water with regard to putting it higher on the list of items that need attention. Changing the voting system doesn’t move this issue down on the daily frustration scale. I think the question voiced by Julie is – when are you going to fix it? It is still a big issue that needs attention.

    Deb

    Deb Dressely | Prospect Research & Database Manager
    Fairview Health Services
    Fairview Foundation & Ebenezer Society Foundation
    Riverside Professional Bldg. Suite 119
    2450 Riverside Ave
    Minneapolis, MN 55454
    Ddresse2@fairview.org | www.fairview.org
    Office: 612-672-7236 | Fax: 612-672-7799

    Connect with Fairview Health Services on social media.

  • Julie Hiland commented
    March 08, 2017 17:05

    Thanks, Jarod. While we are in limbo, can you suggest any workarounds that you've heard other organizations using? For us as a healthcare organization, a lot of spouses have their own constituent records, so the sharing of things like actions (also prospect status, proposals, etc.) is vital to us. And right now, we are in the mode of "taping things together" and it's very inefficient.

  • Guest commented
    March 08, 2017 17:05

    I am so excited to hear that this is even being considered.  At long last!!!  I'm going on at least 6-7 years of wanting this functionality.  Thank you for hearing us.  Fingers crossed that the effort is put forth on this because it would be AMAZINGLY useful.

  • Jarod Bonino commented
    March 08, 2017 17:00

    Hey Julie! Sorry I didn't notice your comment back in December! The new idea bank does not allow individual users to vote multiple times, which likely accounts for most (if not all) of the vote difference that you are seeing, however in general, it impacted all ideas roughly equally. So it should not have changed the relative ranking of this idea. More importantly, however, this is something that we have tentatively discussed doing for Actions in RE NXT, although no formal commitments to doing it (or when) exist yet in RE7 or RE NXT. So please know that we do hear you! It's just a matter of balancing what this work may (or should) take precedence over. I personally do like it and it makes a lot of sense to me!

  • Julie Hiland commented
    March 08, 2017 16:54

    <Knock Knock>  Where are we with this solution. It has over 400 votes on the previous Idea Bank, so the 134 is very misleading. This is something I bump into DAILY.

  • Julie Hiland commented
    December 02, 2016 18:33

    Where are we on this suggestion? I bang my head on my desk nearly every day over this issue...

  • Guest commented
    October 17, 2016 15:44

    Yes, please. It would need to include ability to "soft-credit" organizations too (e.g.) Corporate Foundations; Family Foundations; companies owned by a prospects that gifts flow through; etc.

  • Karen Hartt commented
    October 14, 2016 14:54

    Excellent idea.

  • Guest commented
    October 13, 2016 17:04

    This would make life so much easier!  Please, please, please, make this happen.

  • Load older comments
  • +87