Have spouse soft credit option on report parameters like MG options

Sometimes you want to include soft credit gifts in a report but not spousal soft credits. Would like to have spouse soft credits treated like MG.

  • Guest
  • May 18 2012
  • Attach files
  • Guest commented
    April 03, 2018 21:06

    Sad to see this recommendation has been standing since 2012 and no further action. We are so frustrated wtih spousal soft crediting and the need to differentiate it from DAF and Foundation soft crediting, that we are to the point of considering re-merging spouse records into one constituent and just dealing with Luminate on the back-end. UGH.

  • Guest commented
    March 17, 2016 23:28

    Been saying this for YEARS!

  • Guest commented
    March 17, 2016 23:28

    A closely related idea is soft credit TYPES. Household soft credits serve a different purpose than donor advised fund soft credits, for instance. Soft credits are necessary but the following report disclaimer shouldn't have to be: "Since gifts have been credited to more than one constituent, report totals may be inaccurate."

  • Guest commented
    March 17, 2016 23:28

    I agree - SC "types" are what we need.

    Depending on how you use them that disclaimer may still be necessary.

  • Guest commented
    March 17, 2016 23:28

    Thank you for creating this, Melissa. I've been pulling my hair out over soft credits ever since I started working with RE. Soft credit types would be extremely helpful.

  • Guest commented
    March 17, 2016 23:28

    This would be ever so helpful.