The comment section would be extremely valuable to input Board Roles or notes such as that they are only the board because they are the president of another board, etc.
Changing the status of this idea to Voting Open because it’s been reviewed. While not currently planned, this will remain open for voting and future consideration as a change.
Yes, please add the Comments to the Constituency Codes. I do not have much hope that this will be added since it looks like this was originated in 2012...and several comments in 2016 and now I am adding this in 2021.
Yes, please! Make Constit. Codes more like Attributes so you could differentiate Alum (e.g. lifers, grads, alum, attendees) without having to clutter up the Constit. Codes themselves. much cleaner.
Anonymous, If it were a table then it would no longer be a comment field - I voted for this to have a true comment field. If you want a sub-code table added then that should be a separate suggestion in my opinion.
Whether a comment or a table, it would be valuable to have some way of expanding the information on the constituent code. I'd take whichever option is likely to be implemented faster! :)
The comment section would be extremely valuable to input Board Roles or notes such as that they are only the board because they are the president of another board, etc.
Changing the status of this idea to Voting Open because it’s been reviewed. While not currently planned, this will remain open for voting and future consideration as a change.
Yes, please add the Comments to the Constituency Codes. I do not have much hope that this will be added since it looks like this was originated in 2012...and several comments in 2016 and now I am adding this in 2021.
I would like it to be a sub code table - not just comments.
Yes, please! Make Constit. Codes more like Attributes so you could differentiate Alum (e.g. lifers, grads, alum, attendees) without having to clutter up the Constit. Codes themselves. much cleaner.
Yes, a comments field is needed!
I like the sub code table suggestion!
I would like a Comments field to better describe the code - make it a field that can be queried. This would keep the ConstitCode table cleaner
Anonymous, If it were a table then it would no longer be a comment field - I voted for this to have a true comment field. If you want a sub-code table added then that should be a separate suggestion in my opinion.
Whether a comment or a table, it would be valuable to have some way of expanding the information on the constituent code. I'd take whichever option is likely to be implemented faster! :)
Just simply for export purposes.
Would like the ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute.
Would like the ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute.
Would like the ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute.
Would like the ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute.
Would like the ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute.
Would like the ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute.
Would like the ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute.
Would like ability to enter more information about constituency code, similar to comment field for an attribute
Again, an enhancement that would improve the practical functionality of RE