Yes please

The lack of resizing windows, is more than bewildering, it is frustrating.

Yes, PLEASE make this update.

Please, please, please address some of these basic quality-of-life issues. Monitors are much higher-resolution now, so not only are these windows small, they're effectively getting smaller every year.

753 votes and it's been open since 2016?? I've seen ideas with 1-3 votes move to shipped. Why do ideas with a much broader impact to more users sit for years?

I would love it if the proposal window would retain the setting when I narrow the left side menu to be able to see more of the proposal detail on the right. It is frustrating to have to resize this with every proposal.

Yes, please!!!

I vote YES!!! I don't know how to do it on this page, but please add my Yes vote to your count!

At least maximize the window where you pick the funds

This seems perilously close to an ADA issue...

This is the single biggest frustration I have with RE database view.

Changing the status of this idea to Voting Open because it's been reviewed. While not currently planned, this will remain open for voting and future consideration as a change.

Each window resize would need to be addressed separately, so this very likely wouldn't be addressed all at once. Please note that this idea only represents the ability to maximize windows within RE, so doesn't include changing font size or other visual changes. For those, please vote on or create separate ideas.

It would be nice if the size of RE in general could be customized as well (similar to how ctrl+ will increase individual browser screens and ctrl- will decease). We shouldn't have to change our screen settings to make RE screens larger and readable. It becomes very tiresome looking at 6-8 point font all day long.

Agreed - even if not maximized, they should be resizable and user preference for that resize retained for subsequent uses of the Window.

The most painful one for me at the moment is the Search dialog for Constituent Search, as:

a) It does not appear to be possible to affect the Enhanced Search (per conversation with Blackbaud), an d, even if it was, I think it would affect all other users.

b) In order to add fields (in my case, Import ID is a desired output), it is necessary to use classic searches (unfortunately this seems to mitigate "fuzzy" search - if other know differently, please correct my interpretation). Given the number of fields I need, this results in scrolling, which is time consuming, especially if you need to scan multiple records.

c) While it is possible to open each record to look at fields I'd need to check, this results in the closure of the Search dialog (see Keep Constituent Search Box Open After Opening Record), which means that if multiple records need to be investigated, it becomes very time consuming.

A solution to this issue, the Constituent Search Dialog Closure issue, or both would be very useful.

I agree with this suggestion, esp. for the Mailing program.  I can't see my entire titles in the query, appeal, package, output query etc field , even though I try to prune their length.