Currently we are unable to set default gift types to in/exclude, so when we include more than one giving summary in a query, we have to set up the same configuration each time. This leaves room for error, and is cumbersome.

Be able to have the sort order in Reports and Dashboards to reflect our configuration sort. Case 11632283 lists the full detail of what is being asked. The expected outcome of any Dashboard or Report would be that the table stays intact, not reshu...

It would be useful to be able to have a batch file which contains multiple queries or exports - for instance if you want to export both constituent data but also their gifts and memberships and attributes etc all in one go without having to run mu...

When there isn't a first or last name populated in the record, the To line shows "none." So, people who only provide email addresses are receiving emails To "None." Can there be a way to override this in Online Express, so instead of pulling first...

Not always do we want to assign a solicitor to a donor just because our staff solicited one gift, if so we never actually do so in batch but instead do so through the relationship tab of the constituent record when requested. When in a hurry it is...

I suggest to add the filtered fields to the query control report (checked boxes at the top of the criteria page). It would be helpful to know what is included such as inactive, deceased or no valid address. Thank you

It would be very helpful if RE would allow a setting to be toggled to prevent a gift from being posted into a previous fiscal year. I would be fine with a dialogue box that allows you to override the error or even just a warning to let you know th...

Scheduled queue's need to run on the hosted environment. The queue module isn't worth the cost without this function. Further, the fact that the scheduled queue's don't work is not shared with customers prior to purchase.

When adding guests for a participant RE pulls through the required fields for a constituent (eg address, in our config) when this is not always appropriate. Could it be changed to guests do not have the same required fields?