event payments should be kept separate from gifts

RE includes payment for event attendance in amongst gifts - they're not the same and should be kept separate.

  • Guest
  • Sep 11 2012
  • Attach files
  • Guest commented
    March 18, 2016 00:22

    They are sometimes the same - often partial gifts. If there is no portion of the payment that is a gift then many places do not even enter it into RE.

  • Guest commented
    March 18, 2016 00:22

    We use a gift subtype for these, which helps with some reporting but makes the "last gift" query section completely useless.

  • Guest commented
    March 18, 2016 00:22

    Some (most?) event payments contain partial gifts - what would you do then if they were completely separate? This is what campaigns and or funds are for. This is why you have split gifts. No reason to ask the programmers to develop a whole new place to store these transactions.

  • Guest commented
    March 18, 2016 00:22

    I'm just going to say that I disagree with any change in basic functionality to allow this. There are enough workarounds (subtypes, funds) to allow event registrations to be removed from reporting.

    I do come from a standpoint that event registrations - to the donor - are still "gifts" to the organization. To us on the inside, they show someone's engagement and willingness to spend money on events and support us in a different way than by writing a check and getting a tax deduction.